2017-01-29

Ally Seablom

                                                Where Do We Draw the Line?
There was a time in our history where people respected the land on which they resided. Native Americans have always been able to harness the earth’s resources without abusing or overdeveloping them. They were careful not to disrupt the balance of nature or cause irreparable harm to the resources necessary to sustain their life and livelihoods. In direct contrast to the way the Native Americans treated our land, our government acts recklessly with no regard for how much of a negative impact its development has on nature or natural resources. Earth is viewed more as a resource that we abuse, rather than the source of our existence. Yes, Earth provides us with many useful tools that we are able to use in order to survive and prosper. If we abuse these resources by looking at short term goals instead of long term effects, then we are fueling our own destruction.

            The way our government has gone about building the Dakota Access Pipeline is, in my opinion, disgraceful. There has been no respect shown to the Native American Tribe living on Standing Rock. The companies building the pipeline have shown no remorse for bulldozing over sacred areas and disrupting the peace that is ever-present throughout their land. I question why someone who simply breaks into a cemetery faces severe consequences such as going to jail, however these people are being paid to build and place an oil pipeline on land where the Tribe’s members are buried. It is actions like this that make me wonder what it will take to make Americans see how we are disgracing the nature of our planet and rights of our people. Forcing me to ask the question: Where do we draw the line?

4 comments:

  1. I always agreed that the short term goals we are focusing on now only have negative affects on what truly matters, and that is the long term. For some decisions it makes sense to focus on the short term, but not when it comes to keeping alive the planet we live on. I wrote a similar entry as well focusing on the pipeline, and had a very similar opinion. I do no think they have any right to treat their land differently than anyone else's and need to draw a line of which keeps their rights in mind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I couldn't agree more with what you said. I think you point on the Native Americans was spot on. They used the land safely without having to harm the environment or the people. The government has no limit to stop. But you are completely right with the ending question "Where do we draw the line?" I actually really liked how you ended with a question.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree completely, i really like the way you compared the situation to someone breaking an entering a graveyard and receiving consequences yet the Government was essentially doing the same thing and being paid. It really puts into perspective how unfair this situation is. "Where do we draw the line?" is a great way to end the blog, you leave the reader open to more questions, it really gives the audience a chance to build their own opinion. Overall great job.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree more with what you said. I think the point on the Native Americans was completely agreeable. They used the land safely without having to harm the environment or the people, but the government has no limit to stop. If we don't start thinking long term the land can be in shambles, but ending it with the question stuck out to me as a reader because it allows you to thinking deeper. Very good post!!

    ReplyDelete